<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243</link>
	<description>Views on gadgets, technology and blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks by Aaron Pressman &#171; e-what?</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=2#comment-39063</link>
		<dc:creator>The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks by Aaron Pressman &#171; e-what?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-39063</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: This is taken, with permission, from Aaron Pressman&#8217;s Gravitational Pull blog. One thing is becoming increasingly clear to me as I follow the news and attend various [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: This is taken, with permission, from Aaron Pressman&#8217;s Gravitational Pull blog. One thing is becoming increasingly clear to me as I follow the news and attend various [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampressman</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=2#comment-39015</link>
		<dc:creator>ampressman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-39015</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. Another interesting piece of the puzzle today as the  &lt;br&gt;WSJ reports apple trying to convince TV producers to slash iTunes  &lt;br&gt;video prices in half to generate huge boom in sales. Puzzling to say  &lt;br&gt;the least why Apple would move in the exact opposite direction for  &lt;br&gt;ebooks with a 50% price hike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. Another interesting piece of the puzzle today as the  <br />WSJ reports apple trying to convince TV producers to slash iTunes  <br />video prices in half to generate huge boom in sales. Puzzling to say  <br />the least why Apple would move in the exact opposite direction for  <br />ebooks with a 50% price hike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teapirate</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=2#comment-39014</link>
		<dc:creator>teapirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-39014</guid>
		<description>Amazon seemed to have had a gut-level response that only took a couple days to overcome by rationality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have limited compassion for the authors. They made a decision to be dependent on Amazon, but Amazon is not a public institution dedicated to book selling. A couple days cut off from this overwhelmingly critical source of income is a small price to pay for a wake up call about the wagon to which they&#039;ve hitched their fortunes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amazon might not be a white knight, but at least the path they are blazing has a future for literature. Unlike MacMillan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon seemed to have had a gut-level response that only took a couple days to overcome by rationality.</p>
<p>I have limited compassion for the authors. They made a decision to be dependent on Amazon, but Amazon is not a public institution dedicated to book selling. A couple days cut off from this overwhelmingly critical source of income is a small price to pay for a wake up call about the wagon to which they&#39;ve hitched their fortunes.</p>
<p>Amazon might not be a white knight, but at least the path they are blazing has a future for literature. Unlike MacMillan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SplinteredMind</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=2#comment-39010</link>
		<dc:creator>SplinteredMind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-39010</guid>
		<description>Right, but by pulling books Amazon angered fans of those authors. It also hurts the wallets of those authors who are innocent bystanders in this battle. This puts a large portion of the reading audience against &lt;a href=&quot;http://Amazon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; judging by the overall groupthink on Twitter. &lt;a href=&quot;http://Amazon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; made a choice, and I respect their right to dictate how they conduct their business. I just wonder if there had been a better way. Considering that &lt;a href=&quot;http://Amazon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; caved by Sunday night, I’m thinking they lost in this standoff. Perhaps the move was ill conceived, even if they were on the right side of the argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, but by pulling books Amazon angered fans of those authors. It also hurts the wallets of those authors who are innocent bystanders in this battle. This puts a large portion of the reading audience against <a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a> judging by the overall groupthink on Twitter. <a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a> made a choice, and I respect their right to dictate how they conduct their business. I just wonder if there had been a better way. Considering that <a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a> caved by Sunday night, I’m thinking they lost in this standoff. Perhaps the move was ill conceived, even if they were on the right side of the argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampressman</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=2#comment-39009</link>
		<dc:creator>ampressman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-39009</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s pretty obvious who is on the side of the vast majority of authors and readers for the long haul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s pretty obvious who is on the side of the vast majority of authors and readers for the long haul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SplinteredMind</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=2#comment-39000</link>
		<dc:creator>SplinteredMind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-39000</guid>
		<description>The big problem is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://Amazon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; yanked authors&#039; wares from being on sale to strongarm MacMillan. As MacMillan beats their chest, their authors take the brunt and fans turn their ire towards &lt;a href=&quot;http://Amazon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;. In this battle, the readers and authors are the ones being hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big problem is that <a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a> yanked authors&#39; wares from being on sale to strongarm MacMillan. As MacMillan beats their chest, their authors take the brunt and fans turn their ire towards <a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a>. In this battle, the readers and authors are the ones being hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks by Aaron Pressman &#124; TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=1#comment-38974</link>
		<dc:creator>The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks by Aaron Pressman &#124; TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-38974</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: This is taken, with permission, from Aaron Pressman&#8217;s Gravitational Pull blog. One thing is becoming increasingly clear to me as I follow the news and attend various [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: This is taken, with permission, from Aaron Pressman&#8217;s Gravitational Pull blog. One thing is becoming increasingly clear to me as I follow the news and attend various [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks &#124; Gravitational Pull -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=1#comment-38973</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks &#124; Gravitational Pull -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-38973</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Cane, JA Konrath, April L. Hamilton, Hasna Saadani, Aaron Pressman and others. Aaron Pressman said: The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks &#124; Gravitational Pull http://bit.ly/axEJyQ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Cane, JA Konrath, April L. Hamilton, Hasna Saadani, Aaron Pressman and others. Aaron Pressman said: The real agenda of Apple’s ebook partners: death to ebooks | Gravitational Pull <a href="http://bit.ly/axEJyQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/axEJyQ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecw0647</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=1#comment-38972</link>
		<dc:creator>ecw0647</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-38972</guid>
		<description>This analysis reveals how this &quot;caving in&quot; is a really good deal for Amazon:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs.-macmillan-amazon-is-the-winner/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this is all really the first salvo in  a much larger war to destroy discounting of books.  The publishers really hated the extreme discounting going on in the big-box stores last Christmas and they see this as a way to gain control over retail pricing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Leegin decision of the Supreme Court in 2007 gives manufacturers more control over the pricing chain by legalizing the setting of a minimum price, something that had been illegal under the 1911 Dr. Miles decision.  Good summary here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs.-macmillan-amazon-is-the-winner/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The German company that owns Macmillan is on record as hating ebooks, so this provided them with a nice opportunity to kill two birds with one stone.  Whether it works or not remains to be seen.  I can already feel the warmth from lawyers rubbing their hands together in glee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This analysis reveals how this &#8220;caving in&#8221; is a really good deal for Amazon:  <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs.-macmillan-amazon-is-the-winner/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs.." rel="nofollow">http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs..</a>.</p>
<p>I think this is all really the first salvo in  a much larger war to destroy discounting of books.  The publishers really hated the extreme discounting going on in the big-box stores last Christmas and they see this as a way to gain control over retail pricing. </p>
<p>The Leegin decision of the Supreme Court in 2007 gives manufacturers more control over the pricing chain by legalizing the setting of a minimum price, something that had been illegal under the 1911 Dr. Miles decision.  Good summary here: <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs.-macmillan-amazon-is-the-winner/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs.." rel="nofollow">http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-amazon-vs..</a>.</p>
<p>The German company that owns Macmillan is on record as hating ebooks, so this provided them with a nice opportunity to kill two birds with one stone.  Whether it works or not remains to be seen.  I can already feel the warmth from lawyers rubbing their hands together in glee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunwriter</title>
		<link>http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243&#038;cpage=1#comment-38968</link>
		<dc:creator>sunwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?p=1243#comment-38968</guid>
		<description>“Guys I can walk you through this. How much do you think a hardcover book costs us? A buck sixty. What are we saving? Not enough for the price point to drop from $22.50 down to $8.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So he just admitted to screwing people over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Guys I can walk you through this. How much do you think a hardcover book costs us? A buck sixty. What are we saving? Not enough for the price point to drop from $22.50 down to $8.”</p>
<p>So he just admitted to screwing people over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
