Extra megapixels in Canon 50D hamper performance

I’ve written before about the digital camera industry’s misguided megapixel race, leading to ever more pixels crammed onto the same size sensor in each next generation of camera. The problem is that increasing the density of pixels damages the camera’s ability to cleanly pick up detail. So I wanted to call attention to a recent review of Canon’s new EOS 50D digital SLR at Digital Photography Review, one of the best photography review sites out there.

The new 50D, an upgrade to Canon’s year-old 40D model, includes a 15.1 megapixel sensor, up from 10.1 on the previous model. But the greater number of pixels are simply crammed on the same 22 mm by 15 mm sensor plate (known as the APS-C format in the industry) as the earlier model. So what do you think happened when reviewers tested the camera? Major disappointment:

Considering the disadvantages that come with higher pixel densities such as diffraction issues, increased sensitivity towards camera shake, reduced dynamic range, reduced high ISO performance and the need to store, move and process larger amounts of data, one could be forgiven for coming to the conclusion that at this point the megapixel race should probably stop. One consequence of this is that the 50% increase in pixel count over the 40D results in only a marginal amount of extra detail.

We’re by no means saying the 50Ds image quality is bad but it’s simply not significantly better than the ten megapixel 40D. In some areas such as dynamic range and high ISO performance it’s actually worse and that simply makes you wonder if the EOS 50D could have been an (even) better camera if its sensor had a slightly more moderate resolution.

Here’s the review’s comparison, for example, of close detail in photographs taken at a high ISO rating by the 50D and 40D:

All of this makes one more than a bit disappointed that Canon and others in the industry can’t get over the marketing benefits of the megapixel race (“hey, it’s got more pixels so it must be better”) and move onto to promoting features that actually make a difference.

Prior coverage:

Start saving my pennies: Canon updates 5D digital camera (9/17/2008)

All I ask is a full-frame and a single mirror to sail her by (7/1/2008)

Canon wisely chooses to back down megapixels (3/2/2006)


Posted

in

, , , , , , ,

by

Comments

9 responses to “Extra megapixels in Canon 50D hamper performance”

  1. […] jerryclacks007 wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt […]

  2. skooker reid Avatar
    skooker reid

    So how do you reconcile this viewpoint with your desire for the 5D Mark 2 and its 21 megapixel cam?

  3. ampressman Avatar

    I will certainly be awaiting some reviews of the 5D Mark II, but it
    has a much bigger “full frame” sensor (so the pixel density isn't as
    squashed) & higher quality optics. It may be that the Nikon D700 is
    really the best bet – large sensor size and only 12.1 megapixels.

  4. ampressman Avatar

    So Digital Photo Review (dpreview.com) is out with their review of the Canon 5D Mark II and they're calling it one of the best on the market – http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos5Dmarki

    The review includes some good comparisons between the Canon model and the only other two “affordable” full-frame cameras: the Nikon D700 and Sony's A900. Unlike the counter-productive megapixel race Canon participates in at the lower end of the digital camera market, it's clear that for professional-type gear like the 5D, the company is working hard to make sure the entire camera is upgraded to benefit from the higher pixel count.

    After reading the review, it's a very hard call and I still might rather have the Nikon D700. The Nikon has a much better auto-focus system, a built-in flash for use in a pinch the many fewer megapixels mean much smaller RAW files. On the other hand the Canon is lighter and has movie recording capability and is obviously compatible with the one great (and expensive) Canon EF lens I already own. Looks like I need to blog about all this…

  5. jeremy Avatar
    jeremy

    I've just performed an non-scientific test with the 50D a friend of mine bought. Using two Sigma lenses (18-200 OS and 12-24), the results was so disappointing – compared with shots taken with my Nikon D300 with equal “consumer grade” lenses – that my friend decided to return the 50D! He is now going to by a Nikon D300, but would like to wait until PMA is opened to see if the rumors of the new D400 are true – not to get the D400, but to avoid any price drop on the D300…

  6. Affordable Software Avatar

    I just picked me up one of these bad boys and im now making a software app that will decress pixelated images in low light

  7. Affordable Software Avatar

    I just picked me up one of these bad boys and im now making a software app that will decress pixelated images in low light

  8.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Price is unbelieveable at under $7 each, when a new OEM battery costs as much as $60. Time will tell. If I can get 1/6 the ‘equivalent’ life and service of an OEM battery, it was well worth the price. The S90 OEM battery spec says up to 300 charges are possible. The MaximalPower battery package shows the product has a 3 year limited warranty, but the RMA cost to return if it fails under the 3 warranty period is $9.50 plus postage. Funny that was not mentioned in the “Reviews” I scanned before deciding to buy the batteries. Charged one of the batteries up and it fitted in the S90 with no problem. Now a wait & see game as I compare it side-by-side with the S90 OEM battery. Click Here for More Detail

  9. CD Printing Avatar

    Nice review! Too bad I still can’t afford to buy this camera.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *